Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: arthur pritchard who wrote (136596)	7/14/1999 1:16:00 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 176387

Money Flow INTC 253,651,066 That's a big chunk of change going into Intel. Can't help but think that things look good for Intel's customers. TP

To: arthur pritchard who wrote (136596)	7/14/1999 1:52:00 PM
From: JH	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 176387

Re: VITAMIN MF SUPPLEMENT = utterly useless? For the benefit of the thread, please explain the methodology behind the calculation of MF. My Bloomberg has functions called GM T (money flow, total), GM B (money flow, block), and GM N (money flow, non-block) - these show a line which is a CUMULATION of day-to-day changes in MF. As far as I can see, cumulative MF is totally useless because it has no predictive power whatsoever for a stock's direction. At times, positive cumulative MF seems to indicate rising stock price. However, with most of the NASDAQ listed stocks, MF shows a NEGATIVE divergence with the stock price! The VITAMIN MF SUPPLEMENT is even more useless, since it only shows MF on a daily basis, which doesn't keep track of the cumulative, historical MF. IMO, accumulation/distribution functions like OBV and CHKO are far more usefull than MF. Posting "VITAMIN MF SUPPLEMENT" in large caps is not necessary. The moniker "vitamin" is both juvenile and misleading.