Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hank who wrote (2153)	7/14/1999 1:32:00 PM
From: out_of_the_loop	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

All I know is that a paper has been submitted. Because of that, the study itself is not yet public but has been seen by at least one academician (Dr. Sediaman, an ENT from Henry Ford Hosp/Wayne State )who made a public comment on it on Detroit TV. That is on the web somewhere still and can be found by doing a dogpile search (www.dogpile.com) on Zicam. If you can't find it, PM me and I will search for it at the end of the day. I do know for a fact that the paper was submitted a few months ago and that is all that is public info. I think if it had been rejected, I would think that the company would be obligated to tell us, but the NEJM process can take months. For this reason, I think it is a good sign because they reject things right and left rather quickly. My opinion about this status is conjecture on my part since shareholders are "not in the loop", for good reasons, but I do know very well how the NEJM and other journals work.