Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Knight/Trimark Group, Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond James Norris who wrote (2382)	7/15/1999 1:28:00 AM
From: Stephen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10027

RJN ... nope ... statistically you are wrong. I am not a statistics expert either, but I know some of the method. It may not seem readily apparent when applied to the real world ....but its a fact ...and this is one of the easier mathematical realities !! (horrible isn't it !!). Even if someone shorts, unless the stock always returns to a specific value, it is not a fact that they must lose. And ... anyone who recently bought at 63 ... is fine ... unless they realise a loss by selling at a value less than the one they bought it at. Stephen PS ... It wasn't just your post I didn't read ... I was flipping through them all ..NITE action looks horrible to me ... but I really want to re-establish my position ...