SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Pharmos (PARS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: crysball who wrote (849)7/15/1999 8:09:00 AM
From: Dr. John M. de Castro  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1386
 
Most of the PARS action is on Yahoo! The trash posters have gone away on Yahoo and the posts have returned to constructive discussion. So, the cloistered confines of SI were no longer necessary for discussion. That is why it is so quiet here.

IMHO the growth of revenue is a major development that has yet to be fully appreciated. We are seeing a solid business plan being executed beautifully. It is so refreshing to see a creative biotech company that is also fiscally responsible.

It has been said that success in business is 10% inspirations and 90% execution. PARS has creative products and is executing!

Best regards
John de C



To: crysball who wrote (849)7/17/1999 11:06:00 AM
From: arnie h  Respond to of 1386
 
Crysball:
<Where haave alll the Parsians gone?>
I think they've all gone to the yahoo board. Apparently, they prefer to have their thoughts interspersed with comments coming from people who like to dispense smut.
The news on revenues from Pharmos is wonderful. If they can maintain that progress, the company will do quite well indeed. My concern all along has been that they haven't been putting enough effort into the here and now. Perhaps this says my concern hasn't been material; regardless the sharply increased revenues is most positive and we are beginning to see what management has projected.
I am puzzled, however, by the PR people putting out the positive revenue news, only a few weeks from the Q report, but coupling it with a comment that would serve to dampen any enthusiasm. I tend to believe this is intentional and wonder why. Any thoughts?
The TA continues quite positive.

Arnie

Sorry for delay in response. Computer problem.




To: crysball who wrote (849)7/18/1999 6:46:00 AM
From: Richard Huth  Respond to of 1386
 
Hi there

I am happy that the SI board is becoming again what is was. A place, where well informed investors are discussing subjects of importance.

I have been staying aside for a while because of two reasons:

1. I had the feeling, that a lot of people have been talking about the same subject 3 times a week for several months

2. I hadn't anything new to say, and I didn't want to repeat myself to often (doesn't make it more believable ;-) ).

But you can be sure, whenever I have the feeling I have to say something new, I will do so.

Good luck for everybody,
Richard