SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Stormweaver who wrote (17880)7/15/1999 2:18:00 AM
From: Charles Tutt  Respond to of 64865
 
Three years seems like a long time in Internet time, but it's actually a pretty short time for implementing something with the scope of Java or a shift to thin client computing. Compare with the length of the development cycle for relatively minor incremental changes in Microsoft products (e.g. Win95 --> Win98 is coincidentally about 3 years).

FWIW (and OT), I seriously wonder whether AMD will still exist in 3 years; losing big $$$ and key people must be demoralizing. Contrast their execution with that by TXN, ADI, LSI, and INTC, all of whom also deal with extremely complex semiconductor products.

JMHO.



To: Stormweaver who wrote (17880)7/15/1999 2:20:00 PM
From: Krishna A. Ubrani  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 64865
 
1. Java & Java add-ons (ie. Jini , JFC)
- great language but Sun has failed to make it fully commercially acceptable.

How has it failed? By Microsoft not co-operating? Enterprise
Java is accepted and doing great. Maybe you are not keeping
up with all the companies providing Java support.

- 3 years and still buggy

How many bugs are there in Windows NT? How old is it? Which
OSs/software systems don't have any bugs "after 3 years"?