SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Carl R. who wrote (47168)7/15/1999 11:46:00 AM
From: Estimated Prophet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 53903
 
As my econ prof used to say "in the long run everything is variable."

But marginal cost in economic terms is the total cost, including fixed plus variable, of producing the next unit. So Mr. leader probably should have referred to fixed vs. variable but I think his point is clear regardless.



To: Carl R. who wrote (47168)7/15/1999 11:54:00 AM
From: Jeff Leader  Respond to of 53903
 
Carl - The reason that I wanted to change the terminology is that I was inferring from your posts that your definition of marginal cost included significantly more than variable cost components. Given your definition of marginal costs, why do you believe that producers would consider constraining production? Do you think ASPs are near variable cost per unit?



To: Carl R. who wrote (47168)7/15/1999 12:16:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug  Respond to of 53903
 
carl, marginal cost is typically the decision maker and it is the same as the variable cost of producing the next component. however, companies will produce below variable cost due to a fear they will slide down the learning (cost) curve.

that is why you see inventory levels go up to 80 million units, as is the case with mu. they produce below variable, but don't want to sell below variable. this works until they need cash or technology takes a turn.

then, la deluge. they just try and get what they can for the product.