SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Oracle Corporation (ORCL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mauser96 who wrote (11336)7/15/1999 6:34:00 PM
From: Bill Lotozo  Respond to of 19079
 
What a silly comparison. You buy ORACLE when you have a 100+ gig database and put it on unix to handle hundreds of concurrent users. You get microsoft's database for "free" when you buy back office. Do you think nt/sql server will handle hundreds of concurrent users against a 100+ gig database?

Bill



To: mauser96 who wrote (11336)7/15/1999 6:43:00 PM
From: WTSherman  Respond to of 19079
 
ORCL has nothing to gain and MSFT has everything to gain by having them benchmarked against each other. Why on earth would ORCL want to agree to that? If their products show their clear superiority then they're right where they are now, if MSFT comes even close it lends credibility to their claims.

Nobody with ORCL's marketshare would do this unless they really felt threatened by a competitor and MSFT just isn't that competitive at this time.



To: mauser96 who wrote (11336)7/16/1999 1:07:00 AM
From: Paul van Wijk  Respond to of 19079
 
According to the magazine, MSFT said YES, ORCL said NO. Makes
you wonder who has something to hide....


Remember the 1 million dollar-bet from the last Comdex. Do
we really have to go through that again. I have nothing
against MSFT but take them serious in the databasemarket??

Paul