Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : S3 (A LONGER TERM PERSPECTIVE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ben Wu who wrote (13363)	7/16/1999 8:42:00 AM
From: SBHX	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14577

Based on core business alone, I see a loss of about 17.6c or 16.4 fully diluted (57M shares). There are two interesting extraordinary items. 1. Guaranteed 42M for 5Q. 7M now, 8.75M for next 4? from UMC 2. Income of 3.066M from UMC this Q. Not a bad cash position, but the core business turn around not as much as one would think. Also, R&D spending indicates at least it's not in CirrusLogic mode. ---- Once in a while I also read something so totally wacky that I really don't know what to think. Mr Hardee, this is what you wrote : Why would China jump on Taiwan now when China can wait till year Jan 1, 2000 when it has full/complete operational control of the Panama Canal on both ends for $22.2 million. China has first bid on all our military bases there also to include Howard. Panama has no army so what can they say to China which has already 200,000 china people in Panama. Applying your logic, Israel controls New York, Cuba controls Miami. There are also much more than 200K people of chinese ancestry working in SiV, some of who are in SIII right now. This could mean that China effectively controls SiV as well, if we follow your logic. The correct term for ethnic people from china is not "china people", it's "chinese".