Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (2237)	7/16/1999 11:28:00 AM
From: DanZ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Kevin, Do you have anything worthwhile to add to the discussion of GUMM, either negative or positive? Your style is much the same as "Wexler" and others on this thread: ignore reasonable arguments, use one-liner negative hype BS, and divert attention away from the real issues by launching personal attacks. BTW, what you really think is completely wrong. I have no doubt that some of the stocks suggested by "Wexler" are good shorts. When I first read his post, an image of compressed lettuce and tomatoes came to mind, and I thought to myself, if a company is really trying to sell that product, then I'll check them out further to see if they fit my criteria as a good short. What I found is that "Wexler's" characterization of the company's products was unprofessional, and could even be considered libelous if stated by a firm that has clout in the market place. I have no doubt that the lawsuits would be flying if any firm such as Merrill Lynch, Prudential, or Street.com used the language and tone written in Bill's messages. It is only because "Wexler" is a peon that the companies he has libeled may not care.