Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Merg who wrote (2259)	7/16/1999 1:10:00 PM
From: DanZ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Merg, So my intentions aren't misconstrued, I'd like to point out that GUMM is a long term investment for me and not a short term trade. Respective of this, I'm not concerned about whether a short squeeze occurs because I think the stock will move much higher on the prospects and actual results of Zicam and nicotine gum. Absent a forced buy-in, it is my belief that those who are short GUMM will cover at a higher price anyway due to a rising stock price that either squeezes their margin or forces them to admit that they were wrong. A squeeze, if it even occurs, might make things happen faster, but those who are forced out now might be thanking RPR in a few months. Best regards, Dan