Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (3181)	7/16/1999 5:49:00 PM
From: wasteman	Respond to of 3383

Auric, BIG move to 14 7/8 on heavy volume at the end. This run is different from last year because there is no stream of news coming out. This run is based on an underlying believe in the litter engine that could by individuals willing to take a little risk to earn a great reward. That is what true investing is about, not your negative attempts to degrade and prey on stocks. You WILL NOT beat the little engine that could. It will beat you all the way to the bank. It would not surprise me at all to see this stock over 20 early next week headed for an even faster breakout if the previously discussed July meeting comes to pass. Regarding my due diligence, I know what I am doing and have been very successful at it. I do not make a habit of chasing stock stocks with no value. Never have, never will. I will however ride the wave of a stock with a great concept that will benefit the world. AENG is one of those stocks. If it is successful, it will be great. If it is not, I will not have been one of the naysayers who unfairly harmed it. Sometimes things come along that seem too good to be true, but they are true. The little engine that could may be one of these, in my humble opinion, inspite of you. As for TRAV, whoever he is, whatever his background, this time he is participating in a stock that has great potential. If he profits from it, so be it, he deserves it for taking the initial risk. If it were a scam, there has been plenty of time for the SEC to figure that out, particularly with the investigations they have been doing of late. Next week will be exciting, to say the least.

To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (3181)	7/16/1999 5:50:00 PM
From: Tenpole	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3383

Auric, A post from a lurker who has been enjoying the frank exchange of views between you and wasteman; There is a big 'What If?' about all of this (and I have read your previous posts). What if the engine actually works, or works well enough to engender sufficient momentum behind the company? Is it not possible that the technology can work even if, as you suggest, the stock is being manipulated by charlatans? You seemed to hint at this a few posts ago when you suggested that a change of management would resolve many of the issues you find difficult. And even if the situation is as you describe (ie inappropriate as an investment), does that make it inappropriate as a trade? I don't want to get too involved but I thought I would ask the question. T