Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Catfish who wrote (13289)	7/17/1999 3:08:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13994

>>PiMac, You are an idiot!!! Do you really believe Clinton is a victim? This is typical of the Socialist Liberal mindset of trying to place blame elsewhere. Remember, Liberalism is the opiate of the asses.

To: Catfish who wrote (13289)	7/17/1999 6:02:00 PM
From: PiMac	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

Darrell, as I refined my understanding of the whole episode, I presented an explanation that accounts for the whole mess using only - a minor letch -a simple girl who would not accept mature advice -an overly ambitious lawyer -a judge not extraordinarily prepared. There is no extreme behaviors or motives in any of these actors. Yet extreme reactions were foisted upon the country, which did not want it. Some dramatic explanation is needed to justify this over reaction. And you provide it: -Aliens walking among us. -The Diabolical in human form. -Secret Death Squads. [Where was this secret death squad uncovered? The daily papers - some secret.] You have missed your calling. You belong hosting a millions viewer talk show, not reposting to an obscure, borrowed web site. Darraldo would bring you wealth and fame. You already have regulars here with qualifications to produce the show - all consuming enthusiasm for self-promotion and repertoire of ridicule. Of course, the nation will still watch the 'real people' on Jerry; your audience would be less savory.