Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Win-Lose-Draw who wrote (17344)	7/17/1999 6:55:00 PM
From: Handshake™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25548

"Russell is happy, healthy, wealthy and doing IR for Medinah " WLD you have this in writing I presume????, thats a pretty bold statement for you to make, I'll forward it to Russell to see if he would like to comment on this WLD proclamation.

To: Win-Lose-Draw who wrote (17344)	7/18/1999 12:16:00 AM
From: on parole	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25548

WLD, You stated Gordon House was a director of MXR which was my understanding as well. You then mention Malcolm Fraser was the geologist for MXR which was run by Russell Godwin. You then switch to MDHM and state Gordon House is still writing glowing geological reports on properties in Chile which clearly implies he did the same for MXR. So who was the geologist for MXR, Malcolm Fraser or Gordon House? Twisting again aren't you WLD?

To: Win-Lose-Draw who wrote (17344)	7/18/1999 2:35:00 PM
From: Grateful Reaper	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25548

WLD, I see you're still up to your old tricks. More vague defamatory statements. Ok, so MXR had a reverse split. So what? Is that supposed to suggest that MDHM will have a reverse split? You are really grasping at straws here. Were Russell Godwin and Gordon House still with MXR when the reverse split occurred or had they already left? But regardless of what positions Godwin and House held at MXR and when they held those positions, neither one holds a position of executive authority at MDHM. More importantly, MDHM has officially stated that they have no intention of doing a reverse split. Yet, you still keep trying to create doubt about this issue. Why is that? In the same sentence you stated that NPA was "toasted by the regulators" and MXR had a reverse split. Is there supposed to be some connection between NPA and MXR? More importantly, is there supposed to be some connection between NPA and MDHM? I see you're still talking about "glowing geological reports," which is obviously your attempt to cast doubt on Gordon House's integrity. If you dispute the accuracy of the geological reports done for MXR or MDHM, why don't you have the guts to say so? Gordon House described some of the assay results done for Medinah as "spectacular." Do you take issue with his characterization? What is your background again? Regarding MXR, you stated that "the short position never materialized." Does that mean the short position did not exist, or was it simply never exposed and proven?