SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Wexler who wrote (2304)7/18/1999 1:47:00 AM
From: out_of_the_loop  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10293
 
Bill - great answer - you have already publicly stated that even if the medical community comes to endorse Zicam you will label it a fraud even though that endorsement would result in (quoting you) "scientific evidence".

Your accusations are specious and are gross misrepresentations of the truth.

You aren't the first Yahoo to short this stock. Oh, sorry to use that phrase. LOL. You are, however, one of the few who shorts it in the face of such clear presentations against such action.

You are the first to take such a vocal stand based on three minutes' dd looking at the balance sheet. Definitions have been clearly stated to you and now after knowing 3 minutes' worth you imply knowledge of stock fraud.

Unbelievable. Keep digging.

The Bill Wexler alias knows more than USC Ph.D.s and even if the scientific community judges them as successes, the Bill Wexler alias has determined that they are perpetrators of fraud.

Impressive enough to buy you a ticket somewhere. And it ain't here.



To: Bill Wexler who wrote (2304)7/18/1999 4:10:00 PM
From: Ellen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10293
 
based on fraudulent misrepresentations of Zicam as a safe and effective remedy

and

investors considering purchasing the stock should be aware that management is directly involved in this fraudulent scheme.

As you & this discussion have drawn my interest, can you show where/how/why your statements can be proved? TIA

[otherwise back to lurking]