SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (3161)7/18/1999 10:43:00 AM
From: Mark Bartlett  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4504
 
Elizabeth,

<<Are you sure about the grade of the mine in BC? 1.5% average grade
in a copper deposit in BC seems high, especially an open pit. >>

Well .... I am assuming that the miner I stayed with in that area and that worked on it for many years knows what he is talking about. I suppose he could be wrong, but I think I will give him the benefit of the doubt.

MB



To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (3161)7/18/1999 11:26:00 PM
From: Claude Cormier  Respond to of 4504
 
<<Are you sure about the grade of the mine in BC? 1.5% average grade in a copper deposit in BC seems high, especially an open pit.>>

The average in BC is near 1.5% copper for VMS deposits.

BTW Windy Craggy ad a positive feasibility if I remember..and the grade was 1.6% copper only. Granduc had 1.79%. Britannia 1.9%. These 3 were 3 VMS with copper only..very little zinc, gold, silver or lead.
Of course, the porphyry deposits are closer to .5% copper.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News