SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Allen Furlan who wrote (7784)7/18/1999 11:54:00 PM
From: Paul Senior  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 78783
 
Yes, I briefly looked at Stewart. I chose CTZ because I fell for the received wisdom that title insurance company stocks will fall as their earnings drop which will happen because business will fall off as interest rates increase and/or the housing boom ends. I figured there might be some protection because of CTZ's relatively high dividend. I also looked at FAF which is (or was) a big holding by Marty Whitman's fund. The Barron's investor likes STC because it is more a pure play in title insurance. I like CTZ because it is actually becoming more like FAF - diversified in home warranty, etc.

quote.yahoo.com

Maybe the reality is that the pe's are so low (relative to market) on all three of these companies that they will all turn out to be good buys-- or else they will all turn out to be stinkers.

Still long CTZ, Paul.



To: Allen Furlan who wrote (7784)7/19/1999 11:46:00 AM
From: Paul Senior  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78783
 
Allen: FWIW, I also looked at the other companies mentioned. I think those insurance companies are too expensive now to initiate a buy position (although I'm no expert of course). Only company/stock I like is Gleason (GLE), but it was mentioned in two separate Barron's articles, so there's a Monday morning pop to the stock. I'll put GLE on my watch list. Paul.