Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (2343)	7/18/1999 6:55:00 PM
From: Louis Cornell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

I really, really enjoy reading your thread, Bill. Always entertaining! I can't wait to see how this all plays out. BTW, what do you think of SRCM as a short right now?

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (2343)	7/18/1999 7:21:00 PM
From: out_of_the_loop	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10293

<<< How about the harm inflicted by the promoters of frauds such as GUMM, ZONA, ZITL, etc. who seem hell bent on promoting the stock long before they deliver any earnings?>>>> Once again, Bill, I can only speak about things I know about so I will dismiss any reference to tickers with which I am unfamiliar. I have limited my posts (you seem to be thankful when there is said brevity) to discussions of Zicam and, once again, object to illegal libelous use of the words "fraud", "scam", etc. when they are not applicable. Dan has dealt with the earnings issues with specifics but the point here is that different people invest in growth companies that may or may not yet have earnings. By the way you incorrectly use the word, Lucent would have been an ok company one quarter, a scam the next, and then ok again after returning to profitability. <<<All you have proven is that you can write many, many, many long-winded diatribes and seem primarily concerned with attacking the critics of the GUMM fraud. >> I am not attacking anyone, just answering incorrect assertions and libelous posts. I am tolerant of critics of GUMM, just intolerant of the posts that accuse those honest individuals of illegal activity. Thank you for being concerned about my calmness two days in a row. Rest assured that I am calm because I am posting the honest truth - and have substantiated it to the best of my ability and posted dd to substantiate it. It is becoming boring but I feel compelled to answer you - you seem to need it. You think you are taunting me but I am in control of the discussion. How long you continue this "conversation" is partially in your hands. This is not a group of diatribes, more a filibuster of facts. You can have the last written word no matter how devoid of thought, it just has to be devoid of deceit or untruths.