SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FCM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Noneyet who wrote (1385)7/19/1999 9:33:00 AM
From: lostmymoney  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2891
 
I am still reading the thread. Nothing new except the share price lower. Tom, those posts you referred to are not old. In fact, they are the reason I decided to sell. Mr. Buswell made some big hyping comments in that post from RB, and not too long ago, yet they have not came into fruitation. That is a huge statement about being the largest. I completely forgot about Worldcom.

I like to keep in mind these releases. It seems as if FCM investors go wild on some news, then it turns out to be bullsh**, so they forget it was even said, and do not want it brought up, and then wait for the next release. Thats insane. It has gotten terrible, and I believe investors (even staunch ones) are getting weary. When anyone who has an idea of investing in FCM reads any of the boards, does any DD, will most likely stay away from FCM, strictly due to its PAST inperformance. ( Is that a word) Management is terrible also.

Mike



To: Noneyet who wrote (1385)7/19/1999 9:55:00 AM
From: Bruce Hoyt  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 2891
 
DT, so you are finally going on the record as predicting "it is my opinion that fcm revenues will be significantly less than their last quarter."

I guess we can assume from that statement that you think their revenues will be significantly higher that the standard comparison which is the same quarter a year ago though, right?

And as for why they haven't pre-announced revenues, they are now on the AMEX and earnings reports have to go through them first. Duh! Soon to be Dah! Dah! Dah!

As for the 33,000 short shares, I seriously doubt that you could cover even a small percentage of that since you are here all day, every day, so yes, you could be a shorter. Or you can spare us the suspense and tell us who is paying you rather than have us guess.



To: Noneyet who wrote (1385)7/19/1999 1:27:00 PM
From: mark garner  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2891
 
hey maroon:

did you ever learn what the difference between

revenue
expense
asset
liability??

hahahahha what a fool u r.