SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Saturn V who wrote (66104)7/19/1999 6:56:00 PM
From: Petz  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1585156
 
Saturn V, re:Intel microcode. You made this assertion, However in all instances the AMD code was identical to the Intel Microcode.

Having done thousands of lines of CPU microcode at one point in my career, the above statement is not credible. You already said that AMD did not copy the Intel 486 chip design and layout. But unless the hardware is absolutely identical, the Intel microcode would not work on the AMD design. I also remember that the Am486 was faster at a few instructions (IDIV?) than Intel which led to problems in time delay loops. This could not be true if the Am486 had identical microcode to the Intel 486.

Petz



To: Saturn V who wrote (66104)7/19/1999 9:04:00 PM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1585156
 
Saturn <I am neither a lawyer, nor a Microprogrammer, but I will do my best to explain to the thread.>
I appreciate your sincere attempt. After many
of replies, do you now see how you are confused
with the subject? So, is ICM microcode a vital part
of the 486 product, or is it a non-essential support
tool?
<The courts had ruled that copying of Microcode is
also protected by copy right laws>
When the court has ruled this? Before AMD has
created the product, or only after Intel suied
them?

And finally: did you "blatantly" lie stating that
"in all instances the AMD code was identical to the
Intel Microcode"?

So, please, give all these monikers a rest,
and think yourself.
-Ali