Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FCM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mark garner who wrote (1399)	7/19/1999 7:54:00 PM
From: Noneyet	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2891

Ah, mark did you insert your foot in your mouth and attempt to scream, when you posted this prior to your phone call, email or private message ?? Pay particular attention to the times of these posts, as they were all in the same day. First you claim in the post below that $661,000 is a quarterly number for salaries, and you are arguing the point that $661,000 is enough salary to pay 75 people, if that number is annualized. exchange2000.com Again you repeat the same statement below, prior to your revelation, before your phone call, email or private message. At 12:28 you wrote that you surely don't need any help reading a 10Q, Here's some text from that message that you wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one of us had better learn to read 10Qs and it aint me. surely you weren't try to DISTORT were you? 661,000 is a QUARTERLY number not a 9 MONTH number as you suggested. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exchange2000.com As you clearly state above, "I weren't try to DISTORT were I"? One more time for the history books, this post of yours is prior to your phone call, email or private message, from your Guardian Angel. This post is at 3:25 and you still know how to read a 10Q. Oh sure you do. exchange2000.com Now at 3:48 you are struck with a bolt of lighting out of the blue, and have this revelation below. exchange2000.com Tell me mark why at 12:18 you were using the same number as I did for salaries, and then at 3:48 you have an awakening or a miraculous revelation How did you all of a sudden do a 180% turn on your previous argument where you attempt to suggest that $661,000 is quarterly salary only, and you agree with me that this number is salary. How did you all of a sudden have this revelation ??? Why, because it was after your email, phone call or private message, and you received A little help from your friends Also mark, what happened to your arguement that 10,500 ports sold in seven months time is a double, if the following two quarters sell an additional 9,500 ports. Mr market calls a double when the company sells 10,500 ports in first two quarters and then 21,000 in the second two. That is a double, not your attempt to make figures fit that mathematically just cannot. Your Guardian Angel couldn't help you with that one ?????? One of your more intellectual messages; exchange2000.com hey maroon ( nice color isn't it, did you ever learn what the difference between such and such