SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (66164)7/19/1999 11:13:00 PM
From: Charles R  Respond to of 1574589
 
Scumbria,

<DRDRAM utilization is a chicken and egg problem. People don't use it because it is too expensive. It is too expensive because people don't use.>

We share similar perspectives on this one. The bad thing here for Rambus is PCs drive volumes. Playstation II is good but not quite sufficient.

Doesn't his remind you of the AMD story - hopes for the next Q keep the hopes up and what looks like next quarter is actually next year - traders typically do better in this environment than longs until (if) the dream comes true!

Chuck



To: Scumbria who wrote (66164)7/19/1999 11:24:00 PM
From: Ali Chen  Respond to of 1574589
 
<It is too expensive because people don't use.>
You are overlooking a tiny factor here.
It is really tiny - the RAMBUS implementation
requires sup-nanosecond setup and hold times
on the bus. This is an order of magnitude jump
in board engineering to get into 800MHz.
When you are using a single soldered
chip, it can be done, with some sophistication.
But once you want an expandable and upgradable
system, you are in a big trouble.

Maybe you are right about graphics. However,
the history tells us that the cheap graphics
memory comes via the huge volume of system
memory. Not in the opposite way.

Regards,
- Ali