To: Dan Spillane who wrote (2303 ) 7/20/1999 5:08:00 PM From: Anthony Wong Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2539
Gene Splicing: How to create a life without sex U.S. News July 26, 1999 The U.S. government maintains that genetically modified crops are basically the same as traditional ones, not exotic new life forms. Activists say they represent unprecedented attempts to interfere with Mother Nature. The truth lies somewhere in between. Like all living things, crop plants vary from one individual to another; some are taller, greener, or tastier than others, for example. These unique characteristics are determined by a plant's genes, individual snippets of DNA, the giant molecule that carries all of an organism's hereditary information. For decades, plant breeders have been systematically manipulating the genetic makeup of crops, selecting individuals that perform well–those that are high yielding or pest resistant, for instance–and crossing them with other stellar specimens. But because this process is random and imprecise, it can take more than 15 years to produce a commercially valuable new variety. Conventional breeding also has limits: Breeders can only cross a plant with a closely related one. In the early 1980s, several research groups, including a team of Monsanto scientists led by Ernest Jaworski, overcame this barrier when they engineered the first "transgenic" plant–a petunia containing a bacterial gene–launching the age of agricultural biotechnology. To accomplish this feat, the researchers harnessed the power of another bacterium, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, that causes minor disease in many plant species by injecting its own DNA into the plant's cells. The scientists snipped out Agrobacterium's disease-causing genes, replaced them with genes they wished to introduce into the plant, and then let the bacterium ferry these foreign genes into the plant's cells. Still widely used today, this method has been supplemented with other techniques–such as a DNA "gun" that shoots genes directly into plant cells–for plants that Agrobacterium will not infect. Gene-splicing technology roughly halves the time it takes to develop a new variety. It also means fewer limits on what kind of DNA scientists can use to improve crop plants. So far, for example, they have inserted genes from trees, bacteria, chickens, and even flounder into corn, cotton, soybeans, tomatoes, potatoes, and other plants. Yet the variety of commercially available gene-spliced crops remains low. Most products on the market now have been engineered either to produce their own insecticide (courtesy of a bacterial gene) or to tolerate widely used herbicides, such as Monsanto's Roundup. The result of single-gene transfers, these traits have cut production costs–but they have limited effectiveness. To alter more complex traits such as growth rate and drought resistance, scientists must still learn how to manipulate entire suites of genes, many of which remain undiscovered.usnews.com :80/usnews/issue/990726/26dnab.htm