Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : KOB.TO - East Lost Hills & GSJB joint venture -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: grayhairs who wrote (3574)	7/20/1999 1:22:00 PM
From: Don Richards	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 15703

LOL!! If I may ask,in order for us to be drilling at a 45 degree angle at td,would that suggest that we pulled a "U" turn (huey)and were heading back up??? LOL!(Just kidding of course!:-))) Hoping all's been going well,'specially with the golfing game!I've only been out once this year,but might head out this afternoon.Summer is flying by way too fast!!! Chat again,Don.

To: grayhairs who wrote (3574)	7/20/1999 5:46:00 PM
From: Taff	Respond to of 15703

Thanks GH - Sorry I was not explicit enough, I was putting TD further out than a 1000 feet i.e. 1/4 mile plus and not thinking of a 8 to 13 degree down angle, but more of a 20 plus. Once the formation was encountered re-direct at 45 degree + - through the 2000 or so feet of pay. The decreased deviation to of the angle would allow more opportunities for perforations at various levels or on opposite sides of minor fault lines and more opportunities to evaluate the pay zone. IE gas production in the top 500 feet produced through the annulus and oil/condensate through the production tubing, possibly picking up one or more zones within the structure. The other thought was depending on the BHP on surface they could be pushing out to 3000 feet horizontal Can you believe it, 2nd day of full sun in Calgary, Taff