SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : MFMI and ADVC -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SwampDogg who wrote (288)7/20/1999 11:41:00 AM
From: Jim Bishop  Respond to of 388
 
Fuddle, the way scouser taught me, and it usually works, even on BB's is to watch the william% when it has turned up, and is approaching -48%, that is when I like to buy.

When it is up towards 0, sure, it's overbought, and usually at, or close to it's high, then I'm gone, especially LOL, on a POS, like NPEC. Of course, towards the end of May, it was Maggie's hype, and spam LOL, but thanks anyway Maggie, whatever works. I leave some $$, on the table, often, but you can't go broke, taking profits.



To: SwampDogg who wrote (288)7/20/1999 11:44:00 AM
From: Bob B.  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 388
 
Wow, if I interpreted the graph the same as you, I would not believe in it either. In your example, the William's%R started making an upward trend around mid April. It crossed over the -50 line on the William's Curve and the MACD crossed in the beginning of May (buy here). The graph started making a downward trend back toward the -50 on the William's curve at the end of May, beginning of June. Check out the quotes.

tscn.com

Thank you Fuddle, you have just reinforced my opinion of the William's%R.
In your example NPEC went from a low of 5 cents on May 4, 1999 to a high of 28 cents on June 2, 1999. WOW!!!



To: SwampDogg who wrote (288)7/21/1999 12:46:00 AM
From: scouser  Respond to of 388
 
tuddle , you don't even know how to cut and paste a URL, that was a picture of a naked lady you posted the URL to.
And she didn't have no william anywhere near her.



To: SwampDogg who wrote (288)7/21/1999 10:04:00 AM
From: scouser  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 388
 
muddle, I think I have your little game sussed now.
You say you bought in .41, therefore you must have had an order in at the open ( I expect your denial ) on monday.
Now , why would you thrash me, the stock ,and all on this thread if you were going to place an order????
Would it be that I spoilt your little plan vis-a-vis the "PM" that you said you got? You wanted the price as low as possible for little old you.
You are surely lower than an alligators belly!
Moron of the month for you is an insult to real morons.



To: SwampDogg who wrote (288)7/22/1999 2:19:00 PM
From: scouser  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 388
 
muddle.........
Message 10514881
News out today.
I need your address to send over my shorts. HAHAHA
ROFLMAOATTHESIGHTOFFUDDLEEATINGMYSHORTS



To: SwampDogg who wrote (288)7/22/1999 9:09:00 PM
From: Bob B.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 388
 
Fuddle, just to let you know, I won the wire to wire contest using the Williams%R graph. Coincidence, I think not.

Message 10601186