Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Burgoo who wrote (25315)	7/20/1999 11:33:00 AM
From: J_W	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

Not that the bulls care, but for all of you interested in some relatively impartial data, you might want to check this out. Burgoo, This analysis was written by Bert McComas who posts reports frequently on Tom's Hardware. I don't know how you can term his reports as "impartial" when he has an obvious bias against Rambus. Regards, Jim

To: Burgoo who wrote (25315)	7/20/1999 11:44:00 AM
From: Dave B	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Burgoo, Don't even pretend that Platform99 is an "unbiased" event. Here's the first bullet item from their "About Platform99" page: Three more reasons to attend Platform99! - Gain a concentrated perspective on key platform issues without the bias or control of any single company. An anti-Intel (and probably anti-Rambus) message if I've ever heard one. And here's a partial list of sponsors of the event: * Via Technologies (we know all about their "unbiased" view) * Micron (the most vocal of the DRAM mfrs. wrt anti-Rambus sentiments) * National Semi (very interested in Via succeeding since Via bought Cyrix from them and they'll be producing chips for Via) * AMD (an obvious anti-Intel company) There are no sponsors from the pro-Intel camp. There is a very strong agenda in Platform99 to fight Intel on all fronts. Don't be a patsy. Dave

To: Burgoo who wrote (25315)	7/20/1999 12:01:00 PM
From: visionthing	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

I read that last night--you call that impartial! I THINK NOT! That is totally tilted toward PC133. I don't see that as the future. VT