SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Charles R who wrote (66211)7/20/1999 1:21:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Respond to of 1574477
 
More K7 vs P-III benchmarks
plaza18.mbn.or.jp

AMD Athlon?(K7) 550MHz
ƒ}ƒU[Œ^”Ô•s–¾(AMD750?)
Intel Pentium iii 550MHz
MS-6199(440BX)
“¯ƒNƒƒbƒN‚ÌPiii ‚Æ‚Ì”äŠr
Ziff-Davis Winbench99 Ver1.1
CPU Mark99
51.8
40.8
1.27
FPU WinMark
2990
2790
1.07
Business Disk WinMark
2890
2760
1.05
High-End Disk WinMark
10900
10400
1.05
Business Graphic WinMark
229
196
1.17
High-End Graphic WinMark
671
562
1.19
Ziff-Davis 3D Winbench99 Ver1.2
3D WinMark
959
962
0.97
Futuremark 3DMark 99 Max Pro(1024x768,16bit)
3DMarks
4633
4748
0.98
CPU 3DMarks
9505
8386
1.13
Final Reality 1.01
2D
6.26
5.23
1.20
3D
5.09
4.90
1.04
Bus
8.24
7.07
1.17



To: Charles R who wrote (66211)7/20/1999 10:06:00 PM
From: Scumbria  Respond to of 1574477
 
Chuck,

Is this not an issue that was covered during the design for graphics chip?

It depends on the market which the graphics processor is being sold into. $50 worth of cooling costs is not a huge problem for professional graphics, but obviously is unacceptable for a consumer product.

DDRSDRAM will run into the same kinds of power problems as DRDRAM. Bandwidth comes at a price, regardless of the bus being used to connect to it.

Scumbria


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News