Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : VD's Model Portfolio & Discussion Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: biowa who wrote (6899)	7/20/1999 2:11:00 PM
From: Biomaven	Respond to of 9719

biowa, Agreed. I think we all long since realized that the "Pseudo" is purely self-referential (short for "Pseudo-Pseudo") and doesn't qualify "Biologist" at all. <g> Nice detective work by PB. Still can't figure out the investment implications, though. Peter

To: biowa who wrote (6899)	7/20/1999 3:00:00 PM
From: Pseudo Biologist	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9719

Thanks biowa, Peter for your support. As for sleuth, it really does not take much. Here is the link to medline of the BLyS paper: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Click on "Related Articles" link, and the next thing you see is the BAFF paper; the rest is follow-your-nose kind of work. Now, why would anyone, in their right mind, would want to work for WH in the near or otherwise term?? -g- And, yes, like Peter, I am still looking for the "investable" angle in all this. There must be a pony around here, somewhere ... Oh well. PB