Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WAVX Anyone? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Arthur Radley who wrote (8290)	7/20/1999 3:56:00 PM
From: 24601	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11417

Your #5 is false. You should retract it once you recognize that the form 144 traffic reflects how executives who are compensated chiefly with options manage their personal cashflows. Your #1 is the only point that actually pertains to the company, and it is out-of-date. Your other points relate only to the psychology of the market. If you do not care to re-examine what you think you know, then at least refrain from misleading others.

To: Arthur Radley who wrote (8290)	7/20/1999 4:50:00 PM
From: Wildman262	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11417

Texasclown, Allow me to respond to your nonsense. 1)Yes you are correct. There is has been no revenues to date, because the company has spent 10 years developing their technology and securing the relationships that will make Wave a standard in the PC industry. (and quite possibly the digital industry) Investors are focused on where a company is going, not where it has been. There is no one that can touch Wave's technology. 2)Stock is off 60% off it's 52 week high. What's your point? I have owned many stocks, usually small stocks that have backed off 50% off their highs. Often times the back off for no reason other than a reshuffling of the deck. Read some Peter Lynch and Warren Buffet. If and investor has a long term horizon, this weeks price is not an issue. 3)What well respected fund manager are you speaking of?? You can't mean the clown from the Baron's article. No one has heard of him. There are much bigger players ie. HP, IBM, AOL, Commerzbank, that think Wave will go up. Wave stock has gone down in the past without the Clown from Barons. You can not attribute this to that guy. His main argument against Wave shows that he does not even grasp Wave's model. 4)Show me where Wave's insiders are "bailing". Don't be such a clown. Wave is in the best shape it has ever been in since I began following the company almost 4 years ago. In a few weeks we are likely to hear about the things N*able has been working on that will assist Wave in speeding up deployment. Long and loving it.