Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marginmike who wrote (36292)	7/20/1999 10:05:00 PM
From: PAL	Respond to of 152472

Besides holding my QCOM, I have been selling naked puts Aug150, which was in the money and now out of the money. QCOM keeps going up or stay above 150, those premiums are mine to keep, which means buy more QCOM and sell more naked puts, keep more premium!! Just like chanting, do it over and over again, the same recipe. Paul BTW Ramsey Su, where is qdog? I like his gecko as a market indicator.

To: marginmike who wrote (36292)	7/20/1999 10:06:00 PM
From: Jim Willie CB	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

DELL is NOT dead money dont want to pursue this on Qthread, but they will grow by taking market share from all all all rivals most efficient production and supply chain, excellent peripheral business, even strong small server business true the PC segment will not grow as whole, but big opp still for a DELL to become a more versatile monster in a niche where efficiency is rewarded... #1 website for PC's period still they got zero JW Corned Beef wampum outta me / jim

To: marginmike who wrote (36292)	7/20/1999 11:26:00 PM
From: Uncle Frank	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

* OT * >> Without a change in direction DELL IS AS GOOD AS DEAD MONEY mm, I'm curious about the basis for your conclusions regarding dell computer. Do you have expertise in the sector? I've been told that dell has the best cash flow of any company in the high tech industries, and that the current problem with their stock price is more related to the sector than the financial performance of dell itself. Can you help me understand why this premise might be invalid? Frank