Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lorne who wrote (23379)	7/21/1999 1:09:00 PM
From: fern1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26850

You will get no arguement from me on that. But you are talking about apples and oranges, exploration vs. production. My point is simply this, at this stage in WSP exploration program compared to DMM, and ABZ at this very stage of there program WSP is ahead of the game. Fern1

To: Lorne who wrote (23379)	7/21/1999 1:34:00 PM
From: .Trev	Respond to of 26850

Present company excepted of course! Cheers

To: Lorne who wrote (23379)	7/21/1999 2:26:00 PM
From: WillP	Respond to of 26850

Dollars per tonne rules. If you want to be specific, I suppose...dollars per tonne minus expenses per tonne rules. The best gross ore value Diamet has is around $150 US per tonne. Their average is around $100 US per tonne. The best Aber has is $300 US per tonne, with an average of 193 US per tonne. In the short term, everyone wants Diamet's property. It's in production, after all. [grin] In the longer term? Well, that's what due diligence, and free will is all about, is it not? If Snap Lake hits production in the next four years, without suffering excessive dilution, count me among those that would prefer Snap Lake over Diamet. Frankly, I'm still an Aber fan. Regards, WillP