Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Concurrent Computer (CCUR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve olivier who wrote (10231)	7/21/1999 3:50:00 PM
From: Larry Kagan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21142

Steve O., it seems you're being a real pain in the ass about this. The facts are out there for us to see, and you can interpret them any way you like, but stop trying to force your negative spin down everyone's throat. -Lk

To: steve olivier who wrote (10231)	7/21/1999 7:46:00 PM
From: jeffbas	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21142

No, Steve, not at all. The article is totally mistimed for these holders to dump the stock on its release IF THEY HAVE SOLD NONE ALREADY (which appears from the article to be the case). If they had sold most of their holdings during the high volume period then this article might enable them to sell another 250,000. As it is, if they have sold none, it is not credible that the purpose of the article was to enable them to START selling a piddling amount now. Hedge fund pros sell into strength, just like you do, not weakness. As I said before, I believe this article is the kind of PR a large investor can get versus what us smaller folks can get on the Internet. The real purpose for the large holders may be to increase the chances that the company will get coverage by someone like a Raymond James. Now if a Raymond James were to pick it up, we heard about a rollout, and the stock started rising on 5 million shares per day, I would be worried. But if we read on 8/15 that they did sell a ton, the WSJ will have been had and Ken can contact the SEC about intended price manipulation :>)