To: Ocean_Joe who wrote (23450 ) 7/22/1999 12:44:00 AM From: Kerry Lee Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29386
I respectfully disagree with your rationale but not necessarily your timing. I agree with your comment on analyst coverage/roadshow. However, I highly disagree with those on Yahoo who contend that earnings visibility is the driver of the short term stock price, eg, look at the valuations of both BRCD and ZOOX, both of whom have never come close to making a quarterly profit. New OEM deals/announcements and revenue ramp are the main things Wall Street is looking for, mainly to confirm 2 things : 1. that there is a growing market/demand for the technology/SAN market and 2. that Company X is a major "player" in the FC/SAN space. Wall St analysts will come up with their own projections of FC/SAN market growth and then estimate various market shares/revenue forecasts for the major companies, probably out to 2002. They are likely to base stock price targets on 3 years out projected revenues/earnings discounted back to the present. This is a contributing factor in Ancor's decision to go with the specific underwriters ( Monty/BA, Bear Stearns and Morgan Keegan..Kinnard was payback for sticking with the company for 5 years )who had expertise/analysts who closely follow the FC industry ( with the exception of Kinnard ). I would also add that the current valuation discount of ANCR relative to its peers/competition also reflects: 1)the company's current Nasdaq Small Cap listing ( soon to be a moot point ),2) its checkered operating history which is a red flag to newbies ( including funds ) who are unfamiliar with the company/industry and 3) the lack of historical revenue growth versus BRCD and ZOOX. I am optimistic that all these issues will be moot in the coming weeks/months. In addition, I have the following points to add: 1. some Shorts keep harping on the Sun warrants, but the bottom line is that IF they generate the maximum vesting of warrants ( 1.5 million shares, that is $100 MILLION CASH into the company coffers, despite what any FASB rule says about paper losses/negative margins and the bankers know this. In fact, there are examples of other industries/companies that in which the ANALysts look at CASH FLOW or EBITDA as opposed to net income. 2. Contrary to the LIES of rapper, the ANCOR roadshow has NOT started, primarily because they are awaiting SEC approval to proceed and the quiet period to be lifted. There will be a point in time where the SEC gives Ancor the go-ahead to conduct a roadshow, presumably sometime after reviewing the yet-be-filed S3-A ( incorporating Q2 results ). My understanding of the quiet period is that the company is allowed to issue press releases of a factual nature/in the normal course of business. This would include OEM announcements, however they are not supposed to "hype" any deal, eg use customer quotes in the press release. 3. There are many rumors circulating on Q2 numbers. Mgmt has maintained that the ramp does not occur until Q4 '99/Q1 '00..this was repeated in the recent S3 filing. That is why I have a hard time believing that they would generate revenues exceeding $3 million for Q2. $7 million topline is close to breakeven for ANCR and I do not believe that number is doable until Q4 at the earliest. Finally, I am frankly debating the wisdom of getting up so early tomorrow for the "conference call" which I would not be surprised to hear is a reading of the Q2 press release. Maybe I'll sleep in ...