Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (13273)	7/21/1999 10:06:00 PM
From: Mark Johnson	Respond to of 27311

That is a ridiculous scenario. Obviously your too damn lazy to call the company and talk to the CFO....After you have done so maybe someone could take you seriously. Until you do some serious research instead of blatantly posting wild ass guesses you will be the internet scum you are famous for.

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (13273)	7/21/1999 10:34:00 PM
From: I. N. Vester	Respond to of 27311

Larry, there are several errors in your analysis. 'has probably'....'assuming'...'assume'...assuming' You have not one shred of evidence to base your assumptions on. What insider knowledge you have of CC? What evidence do you have that links CC to the outstanding short interest? Absolutely none. You are the Fred Kellet of CC and you don't even know it. Your profits for CC are made of exactly the same stuff as Fred's calculated profits for Valence. Look in the mirror Larry. You insist on debating on verifiable facts except when you present all your suppositions which you call 'analysis'. "CC could have, should have, might have, must have". What do you actually know? Absolutely nothing. Your so called 'analysis' is pure BS