Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael M who wrote (46321)	7/21/1999 10:18:00 PM
From: jbe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Now I get it. You are ascribing something to me that I did not say. What I did say was the following: Edit: As for the "hypothetical example," do not forget that there are quite a number of professedly "conservative" media outlets. In print journalism, the most prominent example would be The Wall Street Journal. By that, I simply meant the obvious, which is that conservatives do not have to rely wholly on the "liberal" press to get their viewpoints across. They also have access to avowedly "conservative" media outlets, like the WSJ. That does not imply that the WSJ distorts its news coverage. First of all, I think that the WSJ's news coverage, on balance, is excellent. But its editorial page is "conservative," and I think any self-described conservative could reasonably expect to get a more sympathetic hearing there than in The Nation, say.