SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zeev Hed who wrote (13278)7/21/1999 11:37:00 PM
From: Mark Johnson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27311
 
Thanks for letting us know you know nothin'. You said "if indeed they shorted" and "they would probably" and then the useless comparison to "osicom" and "this all depends on".

Not much from an internet genius who has never spoken with a single Valence representative.

Just the usual wild ass guess!!!



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (13278)7/22/1999 12:08:00 AM
From: Pallisard  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27311
 
I don't understand what all the supposition is about, since Valence management has stated specifically that CC is not shorting. Apparently you think they're transmitting false information? - that's a question. If you think they're telling the truth, then your discussions are merely another ploy to create doubt scenarios, unless you're practicing your typing.



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (13278)7/22/1999 12:05:00 PM
From: Gordon Quickstad  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27311
 
>> I think that CC would "hedge" their bets to maximize profits <<

That's a contradiction in terms. Hedging lowers profits in return for less risk. What are you saying?