SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Krowbar who wrote (46341)7/22/1999 1:48:00 AM
From: Michael M  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Delbert -- thought I was snoozing, huh. Please defend your statement that we (United States?) cleared 99 percent of our forests.

By the way, Mr. Hyperbole, this bogus claim is going in your "permanent file." We will be keeping an eye on you.



To: Krowbar who wrote (46341)7/22/1999 7:52:00 AM
From: Ish  Respond to of 108807
 
<<Certainly that is a contributing factor, but we also are pouring record amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere at the same time we are decreasing the number of trees. >>

Technology is doing a lot to reduce the amount of Co2 that is being dumped. Think if we were still polluting at the same rate per capita as we were in the 50s. Could be that since the population has tripled since then sheer numbers of people are an effect.

<<Keep in mind that almost all of our country East of the Mississippi was once forest. >>

I've heard that at one time it was possible to walk from the Atlantic to the Mississippi never leaving the shade of Chestnut trees.



To: Krowbar who wrote (46341)7/22/1999 11:28:00 AM
From: The Philosopher  Respond to of 108807
 
The
Brazilians are asking why it is wrong to clear their forests when we cleared 99% of ours.


From statistics I read, we have more forest now in the US than we had when the pilgrims landed.