To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (2760 ) 7/22/1999 5:33:00 PM From: majormember Respond to of 4140
>>>>>Sunrise's "clinical data looks good," says Hambrecht & Quist analyst Michael Lachman, "but the big question is regression. How well will the results hold up over time?" <<<<<<< Auric, you know I respect you for your wonderful, sardonic wit, the tenacity you have going after crims, etc. I also know you would support a procedure that was truly effective in helping millions of people see better, and at a fraction of the price of the VISX/BEAM PRK or LASIK procedure. If that procedure was also pain free, unlike the excimer which cuts the cornea with a blade, you would be the first to hail it. Now, if the procedure is rejected by the FDA for "conflict of interest" because the best and brightest MD's doing the clinical's have Major positions, it will tank. If the procedure doesn't pass because of bad, or fraudulent results, it deserves to tank. But if it does pass, there can be no better advertising then the MD's who did the clinical's owning large positions. It's like Victor Posnor buying Remington because he liked the product. Anyway, I welcome you here, this is no rollover thread, nor is the product an IFLY, AENG, TERA, etc. where you made excellent calls. You, MP, Pluvia are master's of the game......the best and smartest shorts in the business. Now, to everyone on thread not familiar with Auric, respect begets respect. Do NOT use any personal attacks, we can all co-exist talking about fact's. Auric is a gentleman who won't attack unless he is attacked (don't prove me wrong, please). Btw, I'm calling for $50+ late 2000, early 2001 when revenue starts and analyst's begin coverage. I have DD this for two yrs. Regards, Skane