Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Captain Jack who wrote (65467)	7/22/1999 4:54:00 PM
From: Night Writer	Respond to of 97611

To: Captain Jack who wrote (65467)	7/22/1999 4:55:00 PM
From: Mao II	Respond to of 97611

Cap: I think you got this scoped out. M2

To: Captain Jack who wrote (65467)	7/22/1999 5:05:00 PM
From: Jeng Chiu	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 97611

How is his BIO worse than Hellman??? Hellman wasnt exactly overwhelming either. Re: Capellas 1. He's only been w/ CPQ since August 98. He's not exactly a middle manager that has been involved in CPQ's descent for the past few years. 2. How long would it have taken Hellman (who has no experience in Tech) to understand the technology and company culture. Meanwhile, CPQ wouldve lost even more market share while he was making the adjustment. 3. Even if the Street doesnt like him, who cares, how much lower can this stock go. Are we afraid it might fall back to 22....oooh scary. I am sure that most investors dont care whether it goes from 22- 28. We want long term growth to re-establish the company as a leader and not an also-ran. Proactive not reactive. We need a CEO who has a vision with great execution skills. Is that Capellas? who knows. I want to hear him and give him some time before rushing to judgment.