Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LSI Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jock Hutchinson who wrote (19506)	7/22/1999 6:25:00 PM
From: shane forbes	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25814

Yah wen I rite here uhsooming that it is to be red based on how it is to be pronounced I wood be a dumb ass. But dat is your title. Koodoors. Dow art thee Grande Grande Buffoon. Check back on how you penned Tsukuba in your previous c.call summaries. Maybe you did not because it was not pronounced! Maybe you did. Let me check. Shoot no luck in last 2. One more to try. tick tock tick tock... Nuff said! Besides in my ineeshul post I referred to 'in Q4'95' - but of course you misunderstood this to mean Q1'96. So don't get me even started. It is pointless to look at a stock after it plummets 50% or so [from 55+ to 45 to 27-] and say ah yes on Q4'95 release date when it was 27 'sentiment' (ha ha ha ha!) was bad at the Q4'95 release date and therefore things suck. Hell 22 was around the bottom of the year. I could have made the case that this was precisely the time to buy as within 12-18 months the stock was back up to the mid 40's. As I said earlier I would have been out at 45 and likely considerably earlier when the wheels were beginning to sputter and the signs were in plain view. What you have suggested with the forward 'sentiments' (ha ha) in the Q4'95 release is kind of like the person who locks the barn door after the 'Cows' have bolted to the tune of a 50% loss. Mooooooooo,... Ha Ha Ha... Mr. SCUBA - Ha Ha Ha...