Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Ask God -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jamey who wrote (26368)	7/23/1999 7:47:00 AM
From: Sam Ferguson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 39621

James best wishes to you also. May you discover the TRUTH which will set you free from all misconceptions of who you are and reveal your true identity. I thought you were close to discovery when you separated Paul's teaching from Peter's. I should have realized that since his teachings were so altered that little of his truth came through it would be impossible. Perhaps if you could get an idea of the Gnosis you would be able to see that Paul's Christ was not Jesus. All the original writings of Paul were destroyed. A good clue to where the material went is given in Paul's letter to the Ephesians. This was written in the second century, at least a hundred years after the death of Paul, and an educated guess at the author is the famous Irenaeus. The material is material of deception. It will not hurt anyone to read it. It was written in opposition to the Gnostics and is referred to as a forgery. It is written in defense of the flesh which we just saw Paul write in opposition to. Eph. 5:29, "For no man ever hated his own flesh; but nourished and cherished it, even as the Lord the church." There was no Church at the time of Paul. The flesh is here being defended by the Archons after the onslaught we just saw Paul put it through. What better way to defend the teachings of the Archons than through the name of the teachers which oppose it. Another forgery is Paul's later letter to the Philippians. Here it is written to justify the higherarchy in the name of Paul. There were absolutely no bishops and deacons in the Christian community until long after Paul died. Next comes Colossians which is also a forgery. The garbled first epistle of Paul to the Thessalonians is at best of questionable authorship and the second epistle to the Thessalonians should be renamed, the second forgery of Irenaeus, the Antichrist, to the Thessalonians. 1 Timothy is a forgery by Samael and so are 2 Timothy and Titus. Paul's epistle to Philemon is probably a forgery by Ignateus, but the greatest forgery of them all is the forgery known as the epistle of Paul to the Hebrews. 1 and 2 John are phony. The First, Second and Third Epistles of John come from the second century or later. The epistle to Jude is of the second century and last, but not least, is Revelations. Why the dead man Christians wanted this Canaanite revelation included in their Bible only the Archons know for sure. In conclusion, we see the fact that besides the phony letters and devious forgeries in the New Testament, we are left with an impressive collection of Gnostic material. The coherent whole in Christianity is a coherent hole. When we see the material the followers of the Church and the preachers have had to work with, it is but a miracle the shambles of the Earth is not worse than it is. All our hats should come off for the ministers of the Church. My full sympathy goes toward them. May the cloak of darkness not persist and may they all learn to see, for the truth indeed shall set them free.