Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Harmond who wrote (69139)	7/23/1999 11:09:00 AM
From: Paul Merriwether	Respond to of 164684

perhaps to protect his profits...

To: Bill Harmond who wrote (69139)	7/23/1999 11:41:00 AM
From: 16yearcycle	Respond to of 164684

Blodgett is the one who started this thinking that the nets would not rally in the summer, but would be very strong come late fall and into the winter. His comments about amzn's delayed profitability were consistent with his desire to manipulate these stocks to not rally until the fall. perhaps I am being naive, but I think if he had said that the cc was much better than the spring one, which it was, and it looks like the company is really ready to ramp up now, we would be rallying now.So, I don't think he lost his nerve, I think he is trying to take enhance his reputation for calling these right. It was in his interest to be unimpressed. Meanwhile, he will get his clients in now, and then make positive comments about amzn come fall.

To: Bill Harmond who wrote (69139)	7/23/1999 12:03:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

Sold 1/2 remaining AMZN at 108 Why? I anticipated it to be dead money for a bit. I still have the written calls open. You were the person with which I wished to discuss this. Your thoughts sicne I can buy for about 3 points less now????

To: Bill Harmond who wrote (69139)	7/23/1999 2:42:00 PM
From: mike machi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

Bill: Amzn now at 110.... ? Mike