SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: phatbstrd who wrote (37012)7/23/1999 2:16:00 PM
From: Doug R  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Cool...a conspiracy. I love conspiracies.
Get real.
Ramesh has seen this happen before. He understands what I'm talking about. If he has some respect for the IL, it's because he knows it's warranted.
IL= Impossible Line
ACT=ACcelerated Trendline
RR=Reciprocal Retracement

The IL is established as a type of trendline that is related to but quite different than the lines described as Andrew's Pitchfork.

equis.com
I found the relationship some time after I developed the IL/ACT/RR method.

The IL is normally a very unimportant line since it's so darn steep that stocks rarely reach it. If you drew it and extended it out before a stock moves up to break over it, you'd just have to say to yourself, "It's impossible to think the price could get to there."

As a stock begins its launch to the IL, it does so after setting up an ACT...a very short term trendline that appears as a "bevelled" edge on the chart and very usually shows low volatility along the price highs as it's being established.

The ACT becomes the downside target after the price breaks over the IL.

Once the ACT has been reached, the rebound (RR) is most often of an equal % as the drop from the high to the ACT.

End of story. No conspiracy...just the chart.



To: phatbstrd who wrote (37012)7/23/1999 2:31:00 PM
From: SpudFarmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Short? Let them short...all the way to 200! No worries here.



To: phatbstrd who wrote (37012)7/23/1999 3:42:00 PM
From: R. Ramesh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Ramesh tipping hat to Doug r... i was only fooled once @ age 15, never again.

Good for you. I have seen this happen before to other stocks that I thought were infallible. I am long 250 shares and wanted to calculate if I will go into margin call. I hope you understand that there are people with genuine good (may be selfish) intentions. If not at age 15, I hope you will learn these things now.

Good luck
Ramesh