Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: B.K.Myers who wrote (7036)	7/23/1999 5:45:00 PM
From: bearcub	Respond to of 9818

terrific FAA=lying proof there, b.k. thanks for posting it.

To: B.K.Myers who wrote (7036)	7/23/1999 5:45:00 PM
From: John Hunt	Respond to of 9818

Re Maybe the FAA doesn't consider system installation to be necessary in order to achieve 100% Y2K compliance! Hi BK, Have no fear, I do understand, and I know from your profile that you do too. I used to worry about the number of my own group's software Revisions, until I picked up a simple glass ashtray at a meeting once, that had 'Rev G' stamped on it. < g > I know that realtime Air Traffic Control computers are millions of times more complex than an ashtray, to say nothing of the fact that they have to certify the 'Air Traffic Control System' as Y2K compliant, not just the computer. All this really shows is the incompetence of the management people involved. John