SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: gdichaz who wrote (37063)7/23/1999 6:57:00 PM
From: phatbstrd  Respond to of 152472
 
gdichaz,

I'm not sure that this is a solution, but it seems to me we are short on real news right this minute and this has everyone in limbo with nothing to decipher..Fear can then set in and patience goes out the window. Happens to all of us. I can only suggest that we stay the course.

just trying to help,P



To: gdichaz who wrote (37063)7/23/1999 7:14:00 PM
From: SpudFarmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
gdchaz: > No dialog. Or if any, buried in the morass.

Can anything be done? Any suggestions anyone?<

Your ? raises more ?'s with me. Should anything be done? I do not have any suggestions other than to try to continue the dialog that some may not find acceptable, and some might. I am open to critique, not bashing.

It was my impression that the purpose of the thread is to discuss a publicly traded communication company. (isn't that ironic?) Yes, that involves the technology, this is the core. Doesn't it also involve news, earnings, the market in general (which can have an influence), etc...and dare I say...feelings?

This is part of the fun of investing for me. All the variables and complexities that move the (dare I say?) price of the stock. I am new to this 'board' stuff, so bare with. If anyone has anything to add that is constructive all the better. Good questions, just in time to hash out for the weekend.



To: gdichaz who wrote (37063)7/23/1999 7:22:00 PM
From: SpudFarmer  Respond to of 152472
 
gdchaz: After reading my post, in the first paragraph it sounds like I'm implying that you were bashing. This is not the case. It was just a reference to bashing in general. Thanks