SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : CustomTracks Corporation (CUST) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jenna who wrote (1641)7/23/1999 8:06:00 PM
From: bob yahnke  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2514
 
Well excuse me. I was just joining you and sharing with your succuss in trading cust. What is your problem??? The post wasn't meant to be in competition. Sorry if you took it that way. Get a grip Miss web site. You won't get many posts on your site posting that crap. Oh, but you have a business card. I'm so impressed. "I never post how much I make because the people who make the most are quiet about it." Is that what you said? Seems to me you were here last month bragging about the same bullshit diamond ring that you made because of trading cust. So take your diamond rings and your business cards and get lost....



To: Jenna who wrote (1641)7/23/1999 8:26:00 PM
From: Robert Brooks  Respond to of 2514
 
Jenna-- Do you have any info on the daytraders convention that you could share?

TIA

RB



To: Jenna who wrote (1641)7/23/1999 8:46:00 PM
From: moby_dick  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2514
 
Jeena - congrats on your CUST trades. If you looks at all my CUST messages, I clearly state this is a great trader. Thing is, I never went long - always waited for the stock to go up and then short the bad boy. Just can't get myself to buy and become an "investor" in what I firmly believe to be trash. I agree, I am missing out on half the potential profits, but I don't want to be on the wrong side of this dog when it does decide to crash. Thanks, moby.



To: Jenna who wrote (1641)7/23/1999 10:34:00 PM
From: Mike M  Respond to of 2514
 
A bit of an overreaction considering your previous post. Don't you think?