SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bearcub who wrote (7071)7/23/1999 10:02:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Respond to of 9818
 
Bearcub,

Your not so innocent yourself when it comes to deprecating character assasinations.

your trotted out, programmed responses have left me unmoved as to your suitability to live after Jan 1 as well.

I just don't know where you get off thinking you have to the right to judge whether someone is "suitable" to live at ANY point in their lives.

Who made you God?

I'm really sick of this sparring contest dealing with who is or isn't properly prepared. Your not responsible for anyone else's preparedness and thus you have no right to comment upon it.... just as we have no right to comment on any actions you have taken.

This is a part of the discussion of Y2K that is better left off this board.

If folks want to discuss what they are doing, then fine. But again, no one should make a comment on the rightness or perceived inadequacy of a particular person's actions. Certainly not in public.

It's not helpful to making people conscious of even rudimentary preparedness when they are called polly-annas or chastised for not being as entirely prepared as some others on this board claim they are.

This has become a p*ssing contest between what some could protray as the "survivalist" vs "non-survivalist" mindsets. Each are going to believe the other side is acting irrationally and have little to NO chance of convincing each other otherwise.

So let's knock off the BS and personal insults ON EVERYONE'S part, including myself.

What people or do not do is no one's business but their own.




To: bearcub who wrote (7071)7/24/1999 12:49:00 AM
From: Technologyguy  Respond to of 9818
 
I personally doubt that "another vote for civility" qualifies as character impugning, but, gee, maybe I misunderstand the context.