SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : 3Com Corporation (COMS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mehrdad Arya who wrote (32598)7/24/1999 4:38:00 PM
From: Captain Jack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 45548
 
Oh,, no big deal the stock ONLY dropped 10.1% last week,,, a few more weeks and we will have to pay to hold it..



To: Mehrdad Arya who wrote (32598)7/24/1999 10:44:00 PM
From: Joe S Pack  Respond to of 45548
 
Mehrdad,
Thanks for sharing your impression about 3COM ( 3 inCOMpitents: CEO, CFO and THE Board).

Now you understand why there were so many people unhappy about the current structure.
It has been a very long wait with no relief in foreseeable future.

Regarding IBM deal, it is a good short term prospect. But wondering whether big Blue is in a mood to get the PALM by itself.

-Nat


On Friday I spoke with a lady in Investor Relations, her comments were not very
conducive and as a matter of fact were negative; she did very little to give me incentive
to buy COMS' stock. I personally think that the company is deliberately being
indifferent about their image hoping we all panic and sell, so that they can buy their 15
Million shares at a discount. The average price paid last quarter was roughly $23.625
and I surmise they are hoping that they could buy into their own shares (this quarter) at
the same price. The Directors are smart, they sell their own shares at a premium and
down play the prospects of the company and buy back into it at a discount. It is fraud,
but the key is proving it. Without help from within it is going to be an exercise in futility in
proving this allegation. Hence, only a nuisance in litigation.

BTW - This is common practice in a lot of companies, but good luck in proving it.