Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: d:oug who wrote (37728)	7/24/1999 8:47:00 PM
From: Ahda	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116764

Were Greenspan's comments and tone being directed at another audience across the seas??>> One cannot ever reduce the impact of political on economics nor can one ever have total fair, as life is not total fair. I respect Ron so I never feel he is badgering me. I am a free thinker so with the help of many compile thoughts of my own. If the spirit of "lets work together" falls apart, then I who has the most power has the most to lose, then I will do alone for self and after then I will help you others who now go their own ways .... ... (to me, Greenspan's thoughts/message). The problem with world trade the realty is greed in all directions so the individuals perpetrate the greed with knowledge of conditions of their own nations yet it is not greed because it does create employment within the nation. It gets very complicated as to where the most economical raw commodity can be bought and the labor to manufacture that product etc. In a world of telecommunications at some point it will be one large howl all over for equal work equal pay. So here it is not national is it inhabitants and greed again. I have spent the day with my friend who is going back to Taiwan and leaving her son here at Berkeley in not the best political climate one could hope for in China

To: d:oug who wrote (37728)	7/25/1999 3:29:00 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Respond to of 116764

I'am glad to see that you did not let Ron Reece badger you Jealous? For your information, I wasn't badgering her. Darleen's pretty cool about all this debate, so instead of posting those questions to you or Richard, or myself, I figured I'd post it to her (besides her post was closest to the end of the thread at that time). The question was addressed to one and all. Next time I'll badger you though. Didn't realize you were missing me.... <VBG> But I was amazed at how your post to Darleen used so many words, yet said so very little.