Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DanZ who wrote (2542)	7/25/1999 12:35:00 AM
From: Bill Wexler	Respond to of 10293

<<Good luck with your losing short position>> I'm confused. My current short postion averages 12 3/4 (before commisiions). Considering that the stock is now at 12 5/16 ask, how is that a "losing" short position? techstocks.com

To: DanZ who wrote (2542)	7/25/1999 12:39:00 AM
From: Druss	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Dan Zimmermann--I have been looking over the Yahoo board on SNRS. Having enough money to buy large blocks of stock does not preclude being stupid, not doing good DD, over extending oneself, or being pig headed in an investment. GUMM may or may not be a good investment. I have no position or interest in getting one. I can say though that the argument that someone else has a large position therefore buying in is a good idea is a poor one. SNRS had a 'going concern' clause in the SEC's. People still made every error one can make in a stock and are still howling this is a temporary setback. Druss