Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dale Baker who wrote (41501)	7/25/1999 12:29:00 PM
From: jjs64	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 122087

Dale; Very true....and often they hypesters follow it up with the suicidal "call in your certs" campaign, whereby they try to get morons, suckered into buying the BB crap, into requesting physical cert delivery. This has the result of turning their liquid shares into de facto illiquid crap. When the dump comes, those with physical certs are in for a rude awakening. A newer twist, is the combo "massive short position" "cert call" plus "defamation lawsuit" combo. Best regards!

To: Dale Baker who wrote (41501)	7/27/1999 1:23:00 AM
From: Anthony@Pacific	Respond to of 122087

No firm that is licensed anywhere will knowingly place a illegal short sale for anyone..no client is worth that much..and bythe way most illegal shorts are known only to the shorter ..for example when an insider sells his restricted shares prior to its being effective ..without delivering the stock till it clears ..The firms usually dont know and if they do..they arent at fault..if it is infact a "short sale" butits the insiders who break the laws not the Firm..except in a few cases like stratton or fahnstock..etc.